Ownership - Explanation, Disclaimers & FAQ

Typical Startup Equity
Open Source Native

Our goal is to build Banodoco into a highly-successful business that can support the development of the open source AI art ecosystem - by creating a commercial entity that is an extremely attractive investment for those who believe in our mission and open source. You can read more about our plan here.

Most startups give out 90% of their ownership to founders and 10% to early employees.

However, if you believe as we do that we're in a space that will relentlessly evolve over the coming decades and that this evolution will be driven by open source ingenuity, this incentive structure doesn't reflect where the value will be created - or incentivise the right kinds of contributions.

Instead, we're choosing a structure that aims to incentivise and inspire open source ingenuity in a cohesive direction throughout a far longer period - by sharing 100% of our equity with contributors over the first 8.5 years.

Practically, as per the illustration, this means that we'll split 1% per month between people who contribute open source work that's aligned with our core goals.

How this is distributed will constantly evolve as we figure out the best model - but we hope to arrive at a consistent approach over the first 2 years that is fair and inspires the right kind of contributions.

Disclaimers:

1) We haven't set this up legally yet

Doing this will be costly and time-consuming - it'll become a priority as soon as we have the resources to do so - which will also hopefully be when people start to actually care!

Corporate Structure Example

To achieve this, we'll likely have an entity that owns the "founder's" stock on behalf of the community and distributes realised gains at pre-agreed points - with investors investing into the LLC that the foundation starts with owning entirely. This will allow us to be an attractive investment due to having a conventional underlying corporate structure, while allowing us to distribute gains via the foundation in a way that's fair and transparent to everyone in the community.

While the actual implementation of this is uncertain, below is an example of what it might look like from a corporate structure perspective:

2) Startup equity is highly-speculative

Our goal is that we'll be worth a lot someday - and in this world, even 0.05% will probably be a decent amount of money - but that is objectively unlikely. Given this, don't do anything because you want to get rich. Maybe you will, but really you should do it because you love what it can be and what you're working on - and feel good that - if our collected efforts to create something valuable - you may share in that.

3) Figuring this out will be an ever-evolving process - and we will make mistakes

I believe that this fundamental approach makes sense but figuring out how to actually implement it will take time. We'll also make mistakes along the way - if you feel we've made a mistake, please let me know. I always will want to hear if you feel anything isn't right.

4) How the 'ownership' will be structured is unclear & lots of stuff is TBD

For example, it may not literally be ownership, but possibly an agreement that the grantee can buy equity from us at a price of 0.01c when the equity becomes liquid. However, whatever way it's structured, my goal is that it means that the realisable gains from it are exactly proportional to the percentage of ownership - say, if the company is valued at 1b USD, and you have 1% equity, that will be worth exactly 1% of that (pre-tax of course).

5) Ownership will get diluted as we take on investment, or as we allocate more equity for contributors

Say, for example, we get an investment of 5m USD at a 50m USD valuation. That means that the ownership pool for contributors (including me) will be diluted. In the case of the above example, it would mean that what was once 0.1% of the whole entity, would now be 0.091%. However, this would mostly be offset by the actual value increasing as the percentage decreases. We may also allocate more ownership to contributors - which would have the same effect. While things may change, I can only promise that every change that impacts owners will impact me equally.

Ownership grants to date:

As per the above, each month, 1% of the company will be split equally between contributors. Up until, February 2024, the amount each month was split equally between all contributors. After this, instead of it being split equally, we'll split 0.25% to each major group - core, infrastructure builders, knowledge sharers, and artists. That means all the people listed in that group will get that 0.25% split between them.

Month Ownership Grants
November, 2022 POM
December, 2022 POM
January, 2023 POM
February, 2023 POM
March, 2023 POM
April, 2023 POM
May, 2023 POM; Lone_Samurai
June, 2023 POM; Lone_Samurai
July, 2023 POM; Lone_Samurai
August, 2023 itsB34STW4RS; Kosinkadink; PBPBPB; Cubey; lone_samurai; neggles; toyxyz; POM
September, 2023 Inner_Reflections_AI; Kaรฏros; Kosinkadink; manshoety; Antzu โ˜•; lone_samurai; Draken; jfischoff; RedStrawberries; itsB34STW4RS; Fizzledorf; Consumption
October, 2023 kijai; piblarg; drex15704080; fictiverse; fannovel16; citizenplain; kosinkadink; jfischoff; lone_samurai; fizzledorf; anime_is_real; fabdream; cainisable; redstrawberries; manshoety; drakenza; consumption_
November, 2023 Kijai; toyxyz; Ceyuan Yang/Animatediff team x2; Siraj; comfy; Fannovel16; melmass; Fictiverse; Fizzledorf; Inner_Reflections_AI; Kosinkadink; Impactframes. s; matt3o; Simian Luo; jboogx.creative; Nathan Shipley; lone_samurai; anime_is_real; Dr.Lt.Data
December, 2023 cerspense; matt3o; redstrawberries; lone_samurai; kijai; visualfrisson; piblarg; kosinkadink; thibaudz; drakenza; angry.penguin; jahwffrey; imcybearpunk; felixturner; toyxyz; harrowed; fictiverse; fannovel16; siraj; impactframes; syntaxdiffusion; jboogx.creative; citizenplain; nebsh; benjamin.paine; ai.god
January, 2024 Kijai; Mr Example; NebSH; matt30; Lone Samurai; Polyanna; Kosinkadink; RedStrawberries; Jeru; anime_is_real; Adam; roman_anderson; draken; BennyKok; Inner Reflections; toyxyz; Twist; DataVoid; Semi; Dr Lt Data; Andro-Meda; crishhh98; Marcus Aurelius
February, 2024 matt3o; lone_samurai; kosinkadink; kijai; consumption; mcxi; datarevised; bennykok; extrafuzzy; exponentialml; cerspense; piblarg; pxlpshr; fannovel16; itsb34stw4rs; drex15704080; visualfrisson; mrdravcan; ursium; huemin; fabian3000; enigmatic_e; drakenza; dkamacho; cseti007; citizenplain
March, 2024 CORE: lone_samurai;POM;BadCRC | INFRASTRUCTURE: Kosinkadink;matt3o;Kijai;Fannovel16;Ostris | KNOWLEDGE SHARERS: Purz;Stephan Tual;amli;anรณ;jboogx.creative;Andro.Meta;Klinter;Kytra;Koba.eth;Cseti;nopeburger;Re_diffusion;cyncratic;enigmatic_e;Benjaminimal;cerspense;toyxyz;Impactframes. | ART: neofuturist;Adam;Chris.exe;The Shadow (NYC);yvann;BOLDTRON;The Dor Brothers;itsB34STW4RS;BlueDangerX;traxxas25;jeru;Pollyanna;Hannah Submarine;makeitrad;mrboofy;siraev.vis;MidJourney.Man;Fill;A.I.Warper;Ghost;NebSH;siraev.vis;MH;Pajaritaflora...MaryAnn;Material_Rabbit
April, 2024 CORE: lone_samurai;POM;Ian_G;Pollyanna | INFRASTRUCTURE: mel;Kijai;Kosinkadink;Juxtapoz;matt3o;Fannovel16;Joviex | KNOWLEDGE SHARERS: SuperBeasts.AI (Brad);yuvraj;Purz;Adam;melih;toyxyz;Cseti;Gasia ๐ŸŒท;Impactframes.;DREX;yo9o;Question;Isaac;neofuturist;brbbbq;Piligrim;anรณ;๐•ฝ๐–Š๐–‘๐–Ž๐–ˆ;VK;A.I.Warper;Klinter;nosecretsai | ARTISTS: PTMarks;The Dor Brothers;makeitrad;VisualFrisson;Infinite Vibes;Zlikwid;jboogx.creative;cerspense;Hannah Submarine;A.eye_101;NebSH;anime_is_real;Arkitecc;jags;MidJourney.Man;Scruntee;Udart (Vibeke);Pajaritaflora...MaryAnn;Material_Rabbit;Flipping Sigmas;enigmatic_e;RainbowPilot;traxxas25;Teslanaut;Jas;yvann;jeru;Chris.exe;T2;mgfxer
May, 2024 INFRASTRUCTURE: matt3o:wasasquatch:kosinkadink:kijai:melmass:artchan:jimblug | KNOWLEDGE SHARERS: mgfxer:pollyannain4d:fakeitorleaveit:lovis.io:xander6270:neofuturist:drex15704080:iemesowum:jackg:trenthunter:cyncratic:byronimo:machinedelusions:.tarkan:purzbeats | ARTISTS: arc37us:midjourney.man:zlikwid:hypereikon:ingierlingsson:jboogx.creative:palpapalpa:felixturner:honestabe37:timhannan:cseti007:tonon:tobowers:nftnik:inductor.ai:tkpandaman:0xmacbeth:emmacatnip:iskarioto:johndopamine:_nic_h:chinese_dream:jasblack:minelauvart:aleksej623:material_rabbit:byarlooo:wyzborrero:huwhitememes:earthstorm:baronvonnift33 | CORE: ian_101:.lone_samurai:yuvraj108c:pom_i_moq
June, 2024 CORE: lone_samurai:yuvraj:pom:Austin Mroz:Ian_G | ARTISTS: Hannah Submarine:MidJourney.Man:Chris.exe:sorrymary:kajukabla:Teslanaut:ByArlooo:Material_Rabbit:enigmatic_e:jeru:fabdream | INFRASTRUCTURE: Kosinkadink:matt3o:Kijai:Juxtapoz:jags:TwoPikachus | KNOWLEDGE/TOOLS: Flipping Sigmas:Cseti:mgfxer:A.eye_101:huemin:Jack G:Yvann:Kewk:Jerry Davos:Klinter:cyncratic:Inner_Reflections_AI
July, 2024 CORE: Ian_G:lone_samurai:Austin Mroz:pom | ARTISTS: fabdream:Hannah Submarine:realsammyt:oumoumad:Teslanaut | INFRASTRUCTURE: Kijai:mel:Kosinkadink:matt3o | KNOWLEDGE/TOOLS: akatz:mgfxer:cyncratic:toyxyz:Klinter:atom.p:Jas:fai:Cseti:neofuturist:๐–Š๐–‘๐–Ž๐–ˆ:Kewkใƒƒ:Inner_Reflections_AI:Flipping Sigmas:NebSH
August, 2024 CORE: pom:lone_samurai:melih:Ian_G | ARTISTS: Infinite Vibes:Martin_H:Flipping Sigmas:enigmatic_e:ButchersBrain:fabdream:Hannah Submarine:RenderStorm:Zlikwid | INFRASTRUCTURE: Ostris:Kosinkadink:Juxtapoz:Kijai:RedStrawberries:matt3o | KNOWLEDGE/TOOLS: ryanontheinside:fai:Cseti:cyncratic:Inner_Reflections_AI:Akumetsu971:MidJourney.Man:neofuturist:xander:akatz:[Ai]ndmix:jeru:cyncratic:toyxyz:Nathan Shipley:Klinter:mel:A.I.Warper
September, 2024 CORE: pom:lone_samurai:Ian_G | ARTISTS: fabdream:Hannah Submarine:anรณ:The Dor Brothers:Flipping Sigmas | INFRASTRUCTURE: ryanontheinside:Kijai:matt3o:Nate - LK Dev:Daxton Caylor:akatz | KNOWLEDGE/TOOLS: Yvann:Nate - LK Dev:Kytra:jboogx.creative:Ethanfel:brbbbq:Cseti:Draken:ezMan:Zlikwid:toyxyz:VK:cyncratic
October, 2024 CORE: matt3o:lone_samurai:melih:pom | INFRASTRUCTURE: Kijai:Juxtapoz:Kosinkadink | KNOWLEDGE/TOOLS: akatz:Cseti:Purz:A.I.Warper:Klinter:Yvann:lilien:ryanontheinside:toyxyz:lovis.io | ARTISTS: Zuko:NebSH:MidJourney.Man:HunterS.Freud:anรณ:VisualFrisson:cerspense:sagansagansagans:habibigonemad:The Dor Brothers:RemyCoup:solus_fx:Udart:Hannah Submarine:Chris.exe:Ghost
November, 2024 CORE: matt3o:pom | INFRASTRUCTURE: Kijai:lone_samurai:2kpr:Juxtapoz:Kosinkadink | KNOWLEDGE/TOOLS: Organoids:atom.p:Yvann:lilien:avataraim:ryanontheinside:VK:HeadOfOliver:Mickmumpitz:Cseti:Zuko:Nathan Shipley:DREX:mel:Latent Spacer | ARTISTS: Cristartisty:kentskooking:Hannah Submarine:Nablah:MidJourney.Man:Chris.exe:AndyXR:jboogx.creative:solus_fx:Udart:NebSH:mrboofy:happy.j:Purz:Minelauvart:VisualFrisson

Additional transfers to date:

In addition to the above, holders, in particular POM may transfer equity to contributors at their discretion. This is subject to approval by POM. The below table shows the transfers to date:

From To Amount Date
POM Ceyuan Yang 0.25% December, 2023
POM ComfyAnonymous 0.575% June, 2024
POM Matt3o 3.3625% November, 2024

FAQ:

"What's your plan to make this actually valuable?"

You can read more about our plan here

"Why should I trust you?"

I think that this is a very fair question. - I could in theory go back on this when the company is valuable. In fact, there are loads of ways people screw others in all kinds of equity arrangements. While I do hope to get wealthy enough to not have to worry about money, that's not strictly my goal - in fact, my goal is to do stuff like this for the rest of my life and doing anything that would make me untrustworthy in the eyes of the types of people I want to collaborate with would be stupid and short-sighted.

"If the equity becomes valuable, how will I be able to sell it?"

This is TBC but many private startups like SpaceX offer equity holders the opportunity to sell at pre-determined times and we'll probably do something similar. What we don't want is for our equity to become like a token that's speculatively bought and sold, so will put constraints to avoid this - probably time-bound.

"What about crypto?"

While I dislike a lot of the association crypto currently has, it could in theory be possible to implement this using crypto - if you have any ideas on how to achieve this in a way that isn't bullshitty and aligns with the above goals, please get in touch.

"What about tax?"

We'll try to set it up in a way that tax is only due upon actual gains actually being realised - meaning, you'd only pay based on actual money you make. Again, I'll need to hire fancy lawyers and accountants to figure this out so have no clue what this means right now.

"What if I don't want it?"

If you don't want it, your equity will be redistributed to other contributors.

"What happens if the company is sold before the equity is allocated?"

Firstly, our intention is to build this into a self-sustaining entity for the long-term. However, if we do get purchased by another company, equity will be distributed proportionally based on the allocations made to date. For example, if someone holds 1% of the equity and 33.3% of the total equity has been allocated, they would receive 3% of the purchase price.

"I have another question"

DM me on our Discord!